CaliberAtlas › Methodology

Methodology & Data Sources

CaliberAtlas combines published reference data, stored catalog entries, and calculated results. Evidence coverage varies by record.

See reviewed products and remaining source gaps.

Last updated: September 11, 2026

How to read our source labels

Published reference
A value attributed to a publisher, such as a manufacturer. This identifies the published claim; it does not mean CaliberAtlas independently measured it.
Source reviewed
A document review for the fields identified in the source notes. The review date is when the source was checked, not when a physical test took place. A partial review still has unresolved fields.
Stored reference
A catalog entry whose supporting evidence may be incomplete. A manufacturer name alone does not establish that every value matches a current manufacturer publication.
Calculated result
An output of a mathematical model. Comparisons with published reference tables check the calculation under stated assumptions; they do not establish field accuracy for every load.

A claim of physical measurement needs an identified measurer, method, and conditions. We do not claim that CaliberAtlas has independently field-tested every load or BC. See the reference comparisons for the scope of our numerical checks.

Data philosophy

We prioritize published, authoritative sources and identify unresolved evidence in the source notes. Some older catalog entries still have incomplete supporting documentation. A stored value should not be read as an independently verified measurement.

Understanding ballistic coefficient sources

G1 and G7 describe different reference drag models. Published BCs can vary with velocity; a BC number alone does not identify its measurement method or conditions.

Complete source receipts identify the publisher, document, review date, and supporting passage, and distinguish exact-product evidence from evidence for a broader bullet class or product line. A source review does not independently measure a BC. Unstated velocity intervals, methods, and conditions remain unknown. Multiple published BCs need their stated velocity conditions and reference model preserved, rather than being described as universal values for particular distances.

Hornady's explanation of BC and velocity

Cartridge specifications

Pressure values are shown as catalog values unless CaliberAtlas can link the exact number to a specific standards document and locator. A source URL elsewhere on a record does not by itself prove that its pressure value comes from that authority. Case and cartridge dimensions may still come from published SAAMI or C.I.P. standards where cited.

Ballistic trajectory model

Trajectories come from a 2D point-mass integrator using the G1 drag function, with drag corrected for air density from temperature, altitude, barometric pressure, and humidity. The launch angle is solved for a level zero at the entered atmosphere, then retained for an inclined shot. Ranges follow the line of sight, with gravity resolved along and across it. Wind drift uses the lag-time method; spin drift and Coriolis corrections are not applied. Both drag models use the standard published reference tables (BRL/JBM G1 and G7) with a drag scale derived from the physics of standard air density — no fitted corrections — validated against manufacturer tables: across 8 factory loads from Federal, Hornady, Remington, and Winchester, predicted drop matches published tables within 0.31 MOA at every published distance and 0.12 MOA at 500 yards — see the accuracy page for the full comparison.

What the model does and doesn't do

EffectSupportedNotes
Bullet dropYes2D point-mass integration with the selected G1 or G7 drag model
Wind driftYesLag-time method
AtmosphereYesAir density from temperature, altitude, pressure, and humidity; one atmosphere along the path
Inclined fire−60° to +60°Line-of-sight ranges; fixed level zero retained for the inclined shot
Spin driftNoThis correction is not applied
CoriolisNoThis correction is not applied
Aerodynamic jumpNoNot modeled
G7 drag modelYesUsed when a load supplies a G7 BC; checked against a publisher calculation using measured BC (see the accuracy page)

Standard assumptions

Unless overridden: 1.5-inch sight height, 59°F, 29.92 inHg, sea level, and 50% relative humidity.

Hunting energy reference

Retained-energy references of about 1,000 ft-lb (deer-class) and 1,500 ft-lb (elk-class) are read directly from the trajectory table and never extrapolated beyond it.

Known limitations

The G1 model is least accurate through the transonic zone (roughly Mach 0.9–1.2). Using the July 12, 2026 source audit with modeled results refreshed September 5, 2026, our published rimfire validation covers one load, CCI Mini-Mag .22 LR 40gr. Against CCI's table, modeled drop differs by at most 0.08 MOA across the published drop rows through 75 yards, while retained velocity differs by at most 4 fps through 100 yards. That is evidence for the tested load, not a universal rimfire accuracy bound. Treat other rimfire loads and any trajectory near or beyond transonic as estimates to confirm with measured dope. Centerfire predictions past the cartridge's supersonic range should also be confirmed with measured dope. A G7 value in a catalog record is not a claim that CaliberAtlas measured it; check the source notes for attribution. Loads without a G7 value compute under G1. One representative load is shown per cartridge.

Help review the data

Have about 15 minutes? Help us make the evidence easier to find and understand. This is a review of the website and its published sources; no equipment or range visit is needed.

  1. Choose two or three records you know. Note the cartridge, selected load, and page link so we can review the same entry.
  2. Find the source notes. Tell us which values have a clear publisher, document, review date, and supporting passage, and which details you could not find.
  3. Send the unclear wording or missing evidence, the references you currently trust, and what information would help you judge the record. Include a document link and page or section when available.

Use Report a data or image issue on a record to include the selected load with your message, or volunteer through our contact page with the subject Source clarity review. Suggestions are reviewed before catalog changes are published. Volunteering is optional and does not subscribe you to the newsletter.

Ballistic calculator · Ballistic coefficient explained · Glossary